An open letter to Mem Fox from the director of Parent Wellbeing
September 8th, 2008Dear Mem,
Your recent foray into the childcare debate has been both controversial and revealing.
You first claimed that very young babies in full time child care is tantamount to child abuse. You then claimed that you had not intended to offend anyone but were simply speaking up for the babies who cannot speak for themselves.
In response to your critics, you said that feeling threatened, enraged and in denial is ‘normal’ when faced with an uncomfortable truth. And you accused your critics of ‘shooting the messenger’.
But Mem, there would be no need to ‘shoot the messenger’ if the messenger had not ‘shot from the hip’.
To suggest that today’s working parents place ‘their needs and their situations’ above their babies is inflammatory and misguided.
I don’t know any parent who does not want the absolute best for their children. The so called ‘choices people have to make’ are not made lightly, selfishly, nor independently of peer or public opinion.
From my experience, it is not the baby’s needs that are the elephant in the room, it’s the parents’ needs.
Modern day parents are riddled with guilt and anxiety, and are struggling to give their children the best opportunities, pay the mortgage, and fulfill their personal aspirations.
From the first positive pregnancy test, parents are bombarded with information, guidance and advice about what is ‘best for baby’.
‘Eat iron rich foods; don’t eat soft cheeses. Don’t let your baby cry; let your baby cry. Don’t put your child in child care; put your child in child care.’
Confident and committed parents raise confident and contented kids. But the advice, even when well intentioned, often serves to undermine parents’ confidence and affects their better judgment.
Your ‘child care is child abuse’ comments, even if paraphrasing a child care professional, serve as more grist to the parent guilt mill.
We need an honest, open and productive debate about the work family intersection but Mem, your comments, were unhelpful.
Instead, let’s discuss:
1. How the vast majority of parents prefer to care for their young babies at home, as according to 2005 ABS statistics, only 7% of children in formal childcare (long day care, family day care, with a registered nanny) are under twelve months old, and 47% of children under 12 months attend childcare for 10 hours or less a week.
2. How, Australia, along with the United States, is one of the few modernized, Western democracies without a paid maternity leave system, which would help families defer their return to work.
3. How un-family friendly workplace cultures and structures penalize women and men who take time out of the workforce or want to work part-time when their children are young by limiting their career aspirations and reducing their income potential.
4. And how, definitive research conducted by work family pioneer Ellen Galinsky from the Families and Work Institute in the US showed that what affects attachment between mother and child is not mothers’ working or children in child care but whether the mother is warm and responsive. According to Galinsky, ‘When mothers are doing what they think is right for themselves and their families, children prosper.’
Debates around child care, working parents, and working mothers in particular, are emotionally wrought and highly charged.
The decisions families make are complex and complicated, and are not without emotional anguish.
Parents go ‘out on a limb’ everyday to manage the challenges and stresses of caring for their family the best way they know how.
If anything gives, it is the parent’s wellbeing.
By supporting rather than harassing parents, and focusing on effective public policy, we can help parents love and care for their children.
So Mem, my message to you, is next time you decide to weigh in on the child care debate do so with compassion for all involved - babies and parents included.
Jodie Benveniste
Director and Founder of Parent Wellbeing

